Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Vesselina Kasarova Mozart Arias

There is something unattractive about Vesselina Kasarova's take-no-prisoners style. I’m ok with it in opera seria, such as Idomemeo or Mitridate, re di Ponto, a castrato part which actually suits her quite well, though even in this she has no ideas to sustain her through a whole aria.

But Dorabella? I’m trying to think of a characterization of Dorabella that fits this forceful interpretation of her aria. She regards her infidelity as some sort of triumph, apparently.

Her “Mi tradi” is not bad. But even here there is no relationship between what the aria is supposed to express and what she is doing, which seems to derive completely from the technical considerations.

When punching is the right thing, as in Vitellia’s aria, then it works, but the emotion has to fit her and not the other way around.

She is a true mezzo with plenty of force in the center and a beautiful tone. I’m recommending that she meditate on the concept of phrasing instead of just punching her way through Mozart. Listen to Elisabeth Schwarzkopf’s Mozart, especially “Porgi amor.”

There is simply no substitute for understanding the music you are singing.
#ad

Friday, June 10, 2005

More on recitals

There was an unintended disrespect toward Lotte Lehmann in some of the things I wrote about her. She was very significant in her era, and no doubt, when she wrote about how to present a song she was writing about her own approach to the piece. When I said she was someone from the past, I was referring to her style of singing and the fact that she scoops and slides everything about the same amount. In her time this would not have seemed excessive at all. I have never seen a film of her.

The public presentation of classical music used to be more interesting than it is now. In Beethoven's time arias were presented between the movements of a symphony. It was just assumed that the selection of pieces and the way they were given would be intended to keep the audience amused.

A recital in Lotte Lehmann's era was also different from now. We slavishly follow a chronological sequence, for instance. If I am singing five songs by Berg, they will be 5 songs that were composed together. Lehmann would have selected them for themselves alone, because she loved them and wanted to sing them. She might have grouped songs by different composers and even in different languages together, for instance. They would have reflected different levels of seriousness, something that is allowed only in encores now. We are determined to take all the fun out of it.

Grace Bumbry is not arranging the German composers in the right order or performing songs all from the same Opus. She is probably doing them for love alone. I wish this were always the case, but the demands of career generally prevent it.

I would still like to see the video. I can't help thinking that Lotte's influence would be felt there, too. Lehmann was not suggesting anything so elaborate as operatic acting. Everything would have fit into the natural limitations of a recital, but she wouldn't have just stood there and left everything to happen on its own. She would have thought about the presentation of each song. Remember when I said, "the great stars give you a complete performance?" This would refer to recitals, too.

I'm trying to say something serious in a not too serious way. Opera, concerts and recitals are first and foremost show business. Billy Jean King knew that tennis was show business and created in her person the public interest in women's tennis. Music is show business. Perhaps the academic influence is too strong here as well. I want to be entertained, and I want the performers to think about what they are doing from my point of view.

Thursday, June 09, 2005

I must have been thinking of...

How to Act in Opera

By Alfred V. Frankenstein

For many years, man and boy, professional and amateur, it has been my pleasure to observe many of the world’s greatest operatic stars on the stages of Berlin, Rome, Florence, Paris, New York, Chicago and San Francisco. As a result of this polyglot experience I have perfected what is now in process of being patented under the name of the All-American Five-Point System of Operatic Acting. Just as there are five positions basic to the art of the classic ballet, so operatic acting is reduced in this system to five basic attitudes, which by variation, permutation, combination, synthesis, conjunction and conglomeration create an entire language of gesture suitable for use in any and all situations in any and all operas.

Basic Attitude No. 1 is the Bucket Balance. This is a position derived from the peculiar thing that happens automatically to one’s left arm when carrying a heavy pail of water in the right hand. Its plain or stiff-armed form has an important variant, the Cursive Bucket Balance, done with a more supple motion from the elbow. Both these gestures are universally useful. They can be employed to indicate jealousy, ecstasy, choler, or (as is usually the case) nothing at all.

A second highly important variant of the Bucket Balance is the Invisible Churn. When indulged in at arm’s length this movement is much favored by chorus people to signify animated conversation. When done with a short jab and crooked elbow, the clenched fist close to the chest it indicates villainy. This latter form, however, might be called one of several variations of:

Basic Attitude No. 2, the Heart Attack. This action, one hand placed firmly over the upper ribs, is to well known to require description, as is its first transformation, the Double-Breasted Heart Attack. In this same category comes the Asthma Clutch, similar to the Heart Attack, but with the fingers at the base of the throat. Also under this general heading one must place the Lemon Squeeze, wherein the hands are joined in a tight clasp about four inches in front of the breast bone.

Basic Attitude No. 3 is Worse Than Death. The head is lowered, the hand grasps the back hair, and the bent arm forms a kind of frame for the head. This can be done either seated or standing. It often alternates with:

Basic Attitude No. 4, the Guy Rope Stance. The hands are extended stiffly downward, at an angle of about forty-five degrees from the body, the chest is thrown out, and the feet are often parted in a kind of frozen stride. The whole picture is designed, as far as possible, after the appearance of a governor on a motor. Required of wronged husbands when the bad news breaks, but useful in other situations as well.

Fifth and last of the Basic Attitudes is the Fevered Brow. The back (never the palm) of one hand is placed on the forehead, the head itself is frequently tilted either backward or forward, and the other arm is always extended in a Bucket Balance. The Fevered Brow is usually completed with a determined, side-swiping motion of the hand away from the head indicating that the incredible revelation that produced the gesture in the first place is too dreadful to be believed. It then frequently goes into the Guy Rope Stance.

These are the movements and positions basic to every operatic work of every school and nationality, and therefore are universally applicable. There is also a rich field of gesture and action peculiar to specific works and specific roles which I also propose to teach. I shall, for instance, give careful instruction to Carmen chorus ladies on the approved method of singeing their eyebrows while smoking cigarettes that stick straight up in the air. Embryo Valkyries graduating from our academy will be thoroughly proficient in the Bloodhound Snoop, Seven O’Clock in the Morning (an exercise for the development of the right biceps done with a spear instead of a dumbbell) and other calisthenics of Wagnerian interpretation. No one training for any part in Aida can afford to dispense with Heil Hitler and the Egyptian Double-Breasted Heart Attack. The approved methods of hunting for hidden objects in places here they very obviously have not been hidden will occupy an important place in the curriculum. All manner of shudders, staggers, flops and falls will be appropriately codified. And the subject of placing daggers under the armpit will call for a course all its own.

come uno zabaglione al doppio uovo

"...energetico come uno zabaglione al doppio uovo." Now why can't I write like that? "Energetic like a zabaglione with double egg." This is a description of Marc Minkowski conducting Giulio Cesare. It is unfortunate that opera doesn't make me think of food.

Acting

Sarah's comment that Grace Bumbry did an homage a Lotte is interesting. I assume this means she acted it all out ala Lotte. It would be fun to see this.
Homage a Lotte Lehmann
How interesting. I keyed in "Homage a Lotte Lehmann" and up it came. It's a DVD, naturally.

Long before Lotte Lehmann there was a school of acting that associated each emotion with a specific movement. This would have been very popular with opera singers who generally like to concentrate on their high notes.

Tuesday, June 07, 2005

Recitals

In opera you're allowed to do anything. In general directors should try to remember that the person is going to be singing, but they put them into just about any position. I've never seen anyone singing standing on their head, but that's about the only pose I can think of that I haven't seen. Lying down is popular. Front and back. Singing in the bathtub. Anything.

Recitals are something else entirely. Liszt started the tradition where the pianist plays in profile. He had a really great profile when he was young and wanted to show it off. So maybe the pianist has to be playing in profile before the singer starts standing in the crook of the piano. This is tradition. You can put your hand on the piano, but not all the time. You can fold your hands together, but not all the time. You can take a little step forward. You can gesture as long as you don't get too carried away. But that's pretty much it.

Cecilia Bartoli has been known to choreograph in her piano recitals. When she is doing the French song where she pretends to be a ladybug, she holds her hand out like the ladybug is her hand talking.

But the kind of elaborate movement suggested by Lotte Lehman is really more than we're used to seeing. Anything that gets you thinking about the song is bound to be an improvement. What is this song about? How does it make me feel? If the answer to this last question is nothing, find another song to do. If you always get this answer, take up another profession.

The key is the right action that creates the right feeling.

Monday, June 06, 2005

Lotte Lehmann

Lotte Lehmann was a legend in her own time. She was a famous Marschallin and was considered the greatest interpreter of Fidelio. She was also a prominent recitalist.

She wrote a series of books intending to teach singers how to properly present Lieder. Each song was laid out in a specific choreography. Put your hand up here. Look down here. I think this is a good idea in general because it would prod singers to actually think about how they want to present a piece. They could go on to make up their own choreography, one closer to the feeling of their own hearts. She retired to one of the great teaching gigs at the University of California at Santa Barbara.

The problem with her advice is clear when listening to "The RCA Victor vocal series: Lotte Lehmann." Her French is fine. She sings some of the same Reynaldo Hahn songs that are on Susan Graham's recording and presents them in a much more passionate style. This woman, once famous as an interpreter, seems too old-fashioned to us. Her use of the tools of interpretation is too broad. We want a lighter touch.

Singing, like all of art, is of a time and a place. She is now a person from the past.

Microphones

Hmmm. Could they be using microphones, body mikes in this case, at the Washington National Opera? They can't all sing that loud, can they? This has me very worried.

Sunday, June 05, 2005

Samson

Life is good. I went to the Saturday matinee of Samson and Delilah that closed the season of the Washington National Opera to see Olga Borodina’s Delilah once again. I have seen Olga’s performance in this role three times, three different productions, and it’s interesting that it changes. In New York it was subdued. In San Francisco it was intensely sexual and seductive. In Washington it was angry and evil. So how does that work? I can speculate that the passage of time gives her increased self-confidence and that if she continues in this direction she will dominate the action in a truly frightening way. Her voice and her physical presence are huge.

The tenor, Carl Tanner, was also quite nice. Someone came out between the second and third acts to tell us he had had an asthma attack. This lent an atmosphere of reality to his exhaustion in Act III.

And no, I haven’t been flying around after Olga, too. That is reserved for only one person. I lived in SF when I saw it there, and now I live near DC. New York was on video. After reading about Romeo et Juliette in LA with Anna Netrebko and Rolando Villazon, I could add people to the list.

I am accustomed to hearing opera in the San Francisco Opera house, a place with notoriously mediocre acoustics. Now when I am in other places, I start to wonder if I am hearing the effects of microphones. The singers have so much more presence than I am used to that everything begins to seem bogus. Perhaps it’s just me.

The production was by Giancarlo del Monaco, the son of Mario del Monaco. The first year I worked in the Ulmer Theater he was the Intendant. General manager. He was in his black period when all his productions were black on black. We did a black on black La Forza del Destino set in the Spanish civil war. Leonora wore a black nurse’s uniform with a huge white cross. The governing board warned him that if he did one more black on black production, he was out. So naturally, he did and he was. He went on to bigger and better things. He also went on to other colors. This Samson was full of beautiful blues, reds and browns.

He lived in a different dimension from the rest of us. He came and went with his red-haired wife and two miniature dogs. His flamboyant personality spilled out in every context. He was accustomed to opera in the first tier and was less than thrilled with the quality of the performers he was forced to direct in this third tier house. And he told us. He was multi-lingual and insulted each in his native tongue. I was told that I walked like someone crossing a barnyard. I don’t deny it.

One tenor stood calmly on the stage while Giancarlo ranted and wrote down everything he said. One phrase that has stuck in my memory is “ausgeleiende Stimmbaende.” (stretched out vocal cords). He wrote everything down and sued. When the case came to trial the following year, every insult was read out in court and reported in the newspapers. And read aloud in the cantina. Such fun! Giancarlo was forced to apologize, but paid no money. The judge felt that artists sometimes get carried away.

He works now in the environment that he sought. I have seen several of his productions since then, and they are workable and sensible. Faint praise.

So why not forget that Samson and Dalilah is Biblical and do it as a series of Klimt paintings? The sexiest painter and the sexiest opera.
#ad

Thursday, June 02, 2005

Crossover

I guess I'm a bit of a philistine myself. I'm interested in singing of all kinds. I have a recording called "De mi alma latina" (from my latin soul) by Placido Domingo that I enjoy very much.

I find this recording fascinating because it's true -- his musical soul is in these songs as it often isn't in his serious work. There is rubato all over the place. There is sliding.

He has a vast repertoire which he sings in the same mildly expressive, somewhat bland style. He is a fine musician and a great singing actor, to be sure, but he works no expressive miracles for me. Without the video I don't listen to him.

This is somewhat akin to blasphemy. In the opera world the man is virtually sanctified.

Practically everyone crossed over from somewhere. Placido came from the tradition of zarzuela in Mexico. Only a few, like Luciano and Cecilia, are singing in their native musical language.
#ad